PAPER 2
In this Paper the status of the mass and the status of the wave : current are examined such that the ‘paradox’ that previous scientists have proclaimed in their sowing doubt as to where mass (mass percentage) is and where energy percentage (energy) is ‘dispelled’ by the enunciation of Seventeen Statements – which show that this ‘uncertainity’ stems only and exclusively from our limited perception as humans and not from any limit to our brain faculties -- which together form the matter of ‘Apparency’
In this Paper the status of the mass and the status of the wave : current are examined such that the ‘paradox’ that previous scientists have proclaimed in their sowing doubt as to where mass (mass percentage) is and where energy percentage (energy) is ‘dispelled’ by the enunciation of Seventeen Statements – which show that this ‘uncertainity’ stems only and exclusively from our limited perception as humans and not from any limit to our brain faculties -- which together form the matter of ‘Apparency’
Dialogue :
Pomtus :
Cintius :
Sixtius :
Pomtus : To-day I shall put forth the term apparency. But before I shall (indeed I must) put forth the relative background.
After Einstein science has been in anguish connected with whether matter:energy is a mass or particle : this is the question - and if it is mass or particle is to at all times, simultaneously or otherwise - or the one excludes the other (we say there is inverse proportion)?
I shall from the very start assert :
That matter:energy - all and any matter:energy - is constituted always and at all times by bands:currents of energy:waves. These pass continually through all and any matter:energy irrespective of its state (mass - particle) or its percentages (such as the mass:energy percentage). (1) Also these bands:currents are clusters of particles (2) Also in these clusters the particles are ‘a cluster’ (3) But the particles are also ‘individuals in the cluster’ (4) We however say that we are seeing a particla when and if we have perceived it with definitiness:specificity (5) Particlae in the cluster have a low (though minimal) percentage of specificity:determination:definiteness (6) Accordingly we do not perceive particlae in the cluster unless these are presented as definite to us (7) The rate of (increase of) definiteness:specificity of mass (density:percentage) is as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) our perception of the particlae ‘qua individual particlae’ in the cluster (8) We always perceive correctly as was manifested in the metaphysics long years ago (9) Yet - and this is all-important - there is a gap as between the rate of our perception-in-definiteness and the particla (unperceived) in the cluster that still is unperceived - but is there - especially in sub-divided and sub-dividing particlae (10) This gap is not that we see incorrectly but that the rate of our scientific perception albeit correct is limited especially in tiny quantities:qualities (11) Our perception of the tiny is therefore precise:specific yet limited (12) This ‘gap’ is the equivalent:identity of Apparency q.v. in terms of the Principle 0f Equivalent:Identity q.v. (13) In Apparency particlae do not appear and appear as a cluster when they are individual tiny and could be perceived as by a less limited perception than ours. (14) The ‘paradox’ the ‘mystery’ the ‘scandal’ of science in the matter of particlae:waves has its genesis in and indeed is constituted by and is the equivalent:identity in terms of the Principle 0f Equivalent Identity q.v. of Apparency q.v. (15)
In Apparency thus matter:energy is mass and energy at the same absolute time:space moments : the ‘paradox’ is no paradox at all (16) Mass and energy therefore and accordingly not only inter-transform but are the same (in terms of the Principle 0f Equivalent:Identity q.v.) (17)
Cintius : These ‘Seventeen Assertion:Statements’ hit - so to say - the nail on the head. Together they define constitute manifest signify and evolve Apparency q.v.
Sixtius : And I must add that these Seventeen Assertion:Statements are of revolutionary import. The ‘paradox’ of science fades.
Pomtus : I must repeat that what is being asserted here does not in any way diminish or prejudice the power of perception of Homines Sapientes q.v. and other ens as manifested in previous works – exampli gratiae in the Philosophical Reflections 0n A Metaphysics 0f Existence (1979)
Cintius : At the same the mass:particla ‘paradox’ is manifested and eliminated in the present Dialogue as above manifested.
Sixtius : Thus as in to the mass universe all and any matter:energy is mass:energy and particla:wave at the same absolute time:space moments as above manifested q.v.
Pomtus : At which juncture I deem that we have concluded for to-day thus this Dialogue as for to-day is closed.
Pomtus :
Cintius :
Sixtius :
Pomtus : To-day I shall put forth the term apparency. But before I shall (indeed I must) put forth the relative background.
After Einstein science has been in anguish connected with whether matter:energy is a mass or particle : this is the question - and if it is mass or particle is to at all times, simultaneously or otherwise - or the one excludes the other (we say there is inverse proportion)?
I shall from the very start assert :
That matter:energy - all and any matter:energy - is constituted always and at all times by bands:currents of energy:waves. These pass continually through all and any matter:energy irrespective of its state (mass - particle) or its percentages (such as the mass:energy percentage). (1) Also these bands:currents are clusters of particles (2) Also in these clusters the particles are ‘a cluster’ (3) But the particles are also ‘individuals in the cluster’ (4) We however say that we are seeing a particla when and if we have perceived it with definitiness:specificity (5) Particlae in the cluster have a low (though minimal) percentage of specificity:determination:definiteness (6) Accordingly we do not perceive particlae in the cluster unless these are presented as definite to us (7) The rate of (increase of) definiteness:specificity of mass (density:percentage) is as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) our perception of the particlae ‘qua individual particlae’ in the cluster (8) We always perceive correctly as was manifested in the metaphysics long years ago (9) Yet - and this is all-important - there is a gap as between the rate of our perception-in-definiteness and the particla (unperceived) in the cluster that still is unperceived - but is there - especially in sub-divided and sub-dividing particlae (10) This gap is not that we see incorrectly but that the rate of our scientific perception albeit correct is limited especially in tiny quantities:qualities (11) Our perception of the tiny is therefore precise:specific yet limited (12) This ‘gap’ is the equivalent:identity of Apparency q.v. in terms of the Principle 0f Equivalent:Identity q.v. (13) In Apparency particlae do not appear and appear as a cluster when they are individual tiny and could be perceived as by a less limited perception than ours. (14) The ‘paradox’ the ‘mystery’ the ‘scandal’ of science in the matter of particlae:waves has its genesis in and indeed is constituted by and is the equivalent:identity in terms of the Principle 0f Equivalent Identity q.v. of Apparency q.v. (15)
In Apparency thus matter:energy is mass and energy at the same absolute time:space moments : the ‘paradox’ is no paradox at all (16) Mass and energy therefore and accordingly not only inter-transform but are the same (in terms of the Principle 0f Equivalent:Identity q.v.) (17)
Cintius : These ‘Seventeen Assertion:Statements’ hit - so to say - the nail on the head. Together they define constitute manifest signify and evolve Apparency q.v.
Sixtius : And I must add that these Seventeen Assertion:Statements are of revolutionary import. The ‘paradox’ of science fades.
Pomtus : I must repeat that what is being asserted here does not in any way diminish or prejudice the power of perception of Homines Sapientes q.v. and other ens as manifested in previous works – exampli gratiae in the Philosophical Reflections 0n A Metaphysics 0f Existence (1979)
Cintius : At the same the mass:particla ‘paradox’ is manifested and eliminated in the present Dialogue as above manifested.
Sixtius : Thus as in to the mass universe all and any matter:energy is mass:energy and particla:wave at the same absolute time:space moments as above manifested q.v.
Pomtus : At which juncture I deem that we have concluded for to-day thus this Dialogue as for to-day is closed.