PAPER 3
In this Paper various Proportions are enunciated from other Proportions enunciated previously; thus the Paper and the Principles enunciated are the manifestation of ‘proportio ex proportio’. At the same time these Proportions (a) manifest the way in which the life processes work through Proportions (b) that are proportionate to each other and (c) that ‘open up’ the workings of the life processes – and not only – the engineering relative thereto especially to Immortality, further Evolution, Sub—Dividing Evolution, Shifting of Genes, Rattling of Genes.
In this Paper various Proportions are enunciated from other Proportions enunciated previously; thus the Paper and the Principles enunciated are the manifestation of ‘proportio ex proportio’. At the same time these Proportions (a) manifest the way in which the life processes work through Proportions (b) that are proportionate to each other and (c) that ‘open up’ the workings of the life processes – and not only – the engineering relative thereto especially to Immortality, further Evolution, Sub—Dividing Evolution, Shifting of Genes, Rattling of Genes.
I. ON THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2001 On the 30th September 2001 three Principles were enunciated in the works for that day wherein a union (sexual union) of ‘the most evolved’ species with those ‘of the least evolved’ species is directly proportional to
a) the rate of (increase of) vicinity of the relative offspring to Immortality of Ens [Principle 1]
b) the rate of (increase of) Reproductive Number [Principle 2]
c) the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Principle 0f Shifting of Genes q.v. [Principle 3]
II.ON THE 6TH OCTOBER 2002 : On the 6th October 2002 the following direct proportions were enunciated:
a) the rate of (increase of) sub-division of the relative matter:energy to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Paradox 0f Sub-Dividing Evolution q.v. (Principle A)
b) the rate of (increase of) Rattling of the Gene Particlae q.v. to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the reproductive number q.v. (Principle B)
c) the rate of (increase of) evolution:differentiation to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Paradox 0f Sub-Dividing Evolution q.v. (Principle C)
III.OUR WORKS OF TO-DAY In to-day’s works we note that in the works abovementioned there are manifested a number of proportions, all direct proportions, and most (if not all) of revolutionary import
I note that working as through syllogistic reasoning and using these aforementioned Proportions one will arrive at the following proportions, also direct :
a) the union (sexual union) of the ‘most evolved’ species with that of the ‘least evolved’ species to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Paradox of Sub-Dividing Evolution;
(And vice-versa)
b) the rate of [increase of] reproductive number to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Principle 0f Shifting 0f Genes q.v.
(And vice-versa)
c) the rate of [increase of] all the above direct proportions (saving Immortality 0f Ens) to Immortality 0f Ens
(And vice-versa)
(Is not the Vice-versa here of great engineering import?)
d) The rate of [increase of] sub-division of matter:energy directly proportional to the rate of [increase of] occurrence:progression of the Principle 0f Rattling of Genes q.v.
And vice-versa
e) The rate of [increase of] the ‘most evolved’ species to the ‘least evolved’ species as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution:differentiation
And vice-versa
f) The rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Principle 0f Rattling 0f Genes q.v. as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution:differentiation
And vice-versa
g) The rate of (increase of) sub-division of matter:energy as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution:differentiation
And vice-versa
Do not all these Principles “open up” all and any protoplasms of ens and and any s/c life process(ess) especially as in:to the engineering sense?
13/10/2002
4.11 P.M.
a) the rate of (increase of) vicinity of the relative offspring to Immortality of Ens [Principle 1]
b) the rate of (increase of) Reproductive Number [Principle 2]
c) the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Principle 0f Shifting of Genes q.v. [Principle 3]
II.ON THE 6TH OCTOBER 2002 : On the 6th October 2002 the following direct proportions were enunciated:
a) the rate of (increase of) sub-division of the relative matter:energy to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Paradox 0f Sub-Dividing Evolution q.v. (Principle A)
b) the rate of (increase of) Rattling of the Gene Particlae q.v. to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the reproductive number q.v. (Principle B)
c) the rate of (increase of) evolution:differentiation to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Paradox 0f Sub-Dividing Evolution q.v. (Principle C)
III.OUR WORKS OF TO-DAY In to-day’s works we note that in the works abovementioned there are manifested a number of proportions, all direct proportions, and most (if not all) of revolutionary import
I note that working as through syllogistic reasoning and using these aforementioned Proportions one will arrive at the following proportions, also direct :
a) the union (sexual union) of the ‘most evolved’ species with that of the ‘least evolved’ species to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Paradox of Sub-Dividing Evolution;
(And vice-versa)
b) the rate of [increase of] reproductive number to the rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Principle 0f Shifting 0f Genes q.v.
(And vice-versa)
c) the rate of [increase of] all the above direct proportions (saving Immortality 0f Ens) to Immortality 0f Ens
(And vice-versa)
(Is not the Vice-versa here of great engineering import?)
d) The rate of [increase of] sub-division of matter:energy directly proportional to the rate of [increase of] occurrence:progression of the Principle 0f Rattling of Genes q.v.
And vice-versa
e) The rate of [increase of] the ‘most evolved’ species to the ‘least evolved’ species as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution:differentiation
And vice-versa
f) The rate of (increase of) occurrence:progression of the Principle 0f Rattling 0f Genes q.v. as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution:differentiation
And vice-versa
g) The rate of (increase of) sub-division of matter:energy as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution:differentiation
And vice-versa
Do not all these Principles “open up” all and any protoplasms of ens and and any s/c life process(ess) especially as in:to the engineering sense?
13/10/2002
4.11 P.M.