CONTROLLER CONTROLLED IN SCIENCE; DIFFERENTIATION AND LESS DIFFERENTIATED; BALANCING OF SIDES

Now we must consider that between the “newly introduced” particle and the rest a reference frame is formed : a reference frame that in which the “newly introduced” particle will control the other particles in the reference frame as the sun the planets in our planetary system.

And here comes the consequential Dictum:

In any reference frame matter:energy between the “two sides” is such that that the rate of differentiation of the one is equal to the rate of differentiation of the rest.

Now this must not mean spatial equality but equality of differentiation.

Indeed, there is always a “balance of differentiation” between the “two sides” of any reference frame : irrespective of the physical: spatial size of the site of each.

But the following rule is always observed:

Rate of differentiation of one side X rate of volume (of space) of the same side ::: Rate of differentiation of the other side X the rate of volume (of space) of the same side

From which follows that if in any one of the balancing sides of the reference frame the rate of differentiation per specific unit of space is immensely higher than that in the other balancing side than the rate of volume of the former must be as less to that of the latter in as direct proportion

And vice-versa

Hence this is a Principle (q.v.) in itself.

(Principle 0f Balancing Sides of Reference Frames).

2/11/1996

7.15 P M

3/11/1996

7.25 A M

*This Paper investigates the Controller : Controlled in Science and the mass universe; the power exercised by differentiation over the less differentiated; and thus as of the Principle of Balancing of Sides in the Reference Frames q.v.**Refer to the Doctrine of Controller and Controlled as per our***Spirit of Metaphysics.***Does the whole control the part?**Or the part the whole?**Or both control each other and are controlled by each other?**In the Rim of the mass universe as matter:energy moves largely as non-differentiated (though a rate of differentiation, however minimal, there must be) the whole controls the part.**But as matter:energy - further and further in to the mass:universe - becomes more and more differentiated this situation is reversed : id est the part will start controlling the whole.**And this occurs in as direct proportion.**Hence the Principle:**That:**In the mass universe the rate at which the whole (of matter:energy) controls the part* will be as inversely proportional to the rate of (increase of) differentiation of the same (matter:energy)**And vice-versa***or : in other words: the part is controlled by the whole**Now as manifested earlier on in our works:**In the mass:universe, the rate of (increase of) differentiation of any matter:energy will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution of the same (matter:energy)**And vice-versa**Therefore, and as by syllogistic reasoning,**In the mass:universe the rate at which the whole (of matter:energy) controls the part will be as inversely proportional to the rate of evolution of the same (matter:energy)**And vice-versa**The consequences of all these are as immense as they are revolutionary.**For suppose that we throw a particle in protoplasms of ens which is much more differentiated than all the other particles.**In this case this “new” particle will control the other particles (less differentiated than it) by the amount by which the rate of differentiation of the “new” particle exceeds the average rate of differentiation of the other “old” particles**And this occurs in as direct proportion**Hence the Principle:**That:**The rate at which any “newly introduced” particle in any protoplasms of ens (or any other matter:energy) will control the other particles of that protoplasms of ens (or other matter:energy) will be as directly proportional to the rate by which the rate of differentiation of the “new” particle will exceed the average rate of differentiation of the other “old” particles**And vice-versa**The engineering prowess of the “newly introduced” particle is immense.**According to the dose of “excess of differentiation” we condition engineer and prompt the rest of the protoplasms of ens (or any other matter:energy) at will.**What is important here is the quantum of the dose of “excess of differentiation” (q.v.).*Now we must consider that between the “newly introduced” particle and the rest a reference frame is formed : a reference frame that in which the “newly introduced” particle will control the other particles in the reference frame as the sun the planets in our planetary system.

And here comes the consequential Dictum:

In any reference frame matter:energy between the “two sides” is such that that the rate of differentiation of the one is equal to the rate of differentiation of the rest.

Now this must not mean spatial equality but equality of differentiation.

Indeed, there is always a “balance of differentiation” between the “two sides” of any reference frame : irrespective of the physical: spatial size of the site of each.

But the following rule is always observed:

Rate of differentiation of one side X rate of volume (of space) of the same side ::: Rate of differentiation of the other side X the rate of volume (of space) of the same side

From which follows that if in any one of the balancing sides of the reference frame the rate of differentiation per specific unit of space is immensely higher than that in the other balancing side than the rate of volume of the former must be as less to that of the latter in as direct proportion

And vice-versa

Hence this is a Principle (q.v.) in itself.

(Principle 0f Balancing Sides of Reference Frames).

2/11/1996

7.15 P M

**The rate of vicinity at which any gene: particle consist of a single atom will be as inversely proportional to the rate of (increase of) differentiation of the same (gene: particle)****And vice-versa**3/11/1996

7.25 A M