OF IMMUNOLOGY VIS-À-VIS THE GENETICS AND OTHER MATTERS
In this Paper the immunology vis-à-vis the Genetics and engineering of life processes is manifested in a number of new Principles
Following yesterday’s works:
1.The rate at which the dominant genes constitute the immunological system of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of efficiency of the immunology of that (immunological) system
And vice-versa
2.The rate of highness of percentage* of dominant genes in any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of efficiency of the immunological system of the same (protoplasms of ens)
And vice-versa
*For we term that there be a dominant: recessive percentage in every protoplasms of ens (cf. the mass:energy percentage).
And this dominant: recessive percentage must operate like unto the mass:energy percentage - and there must be a Principle of Dominant: Recessive Percentage which must operate like unto the Principle of the Mass: Energy Percentage -
3.And:
As by syllogistic reasoning:
The rate at which the dominant genes constitute the immunological system of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of highness of percentage of dominant genes in the same (protoplasms of ens)
And vice-versa
4.The rate of resistance to genes in any protoplasms of ens to bombarding variation: receptions
will be as directly proportional to the rate of dominant percentage at the site in those genes
And vice-versa
For its is the dominant genes that resist most the onslaught, say, of invading bacteria; the recessive genes fall first.
5.Further:
The rate of change (once having occurred) in any dominant gene by invading: bombarding variation: reception(s) will be as directly proportional to the rate of variation: mutation in the relative site
And vice-versa
Now I think that we must dwell a little on this Principle which is of revolutionary import and is indeed at the basis of progression of all evolution.
Now once that there is any bombardment: invasion of variation: reception(s) at any site in any protoplasms of ens it is the dominant genes that resist most (and this in as direct proportion as per the above-mentioned Principle of Resistance q.v.)
Any recessive gene at the bombarded: invaded site will succumb almost immediately - but then the gene (recessive gene) as altered will not constitute a very high variation: mutation.
But in the eventual alteration of dominant genes the picture and the situation is different.
For once that any dominant gene is altered then the alteration once lodged “in the body” of the relative protoplasms of ens will be increased in efficiency in as direct proportion.
As exprest in this Principle:
The rate of resistance of any gene to alteration by any variation: reception will be as directly proportional to the rate of mutation: variation operating in the relative gene once that, and if, it be altered
And vice-versa
I shall term this as at the basis of all evolutionary progression and as the font of engineering ways and means at the same time.
For once that we as by engineering means alter or mutate a dominant gene in any protoplasms of ens then we will reach an efficiency of engineering in as direct proportion to the rate of dominance of the gene altered
This itself is a Principle (q.v.).
Thus the maximum efficiency of engineering into protoplasms of ens is attained if a dominant gene rather than a recessive gene is altered; and further, amongst dominant genes themselves, if a more dominant gene rather than a less dominant gene be altered.
And all this must occur in as direct proportion to the rate of dominance (and in as inverse proportion to the rate of recession) of the (relative) genes.
25.8.1996
8.00 A M
In this Paper the immunology vis-à-vis the Genetics and engineering of life processes is manifested in a number of new Principles
Following yesterday’s works:
1.The rate at which the dominant genes constitute the immunological system of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of efficiency of the immunology of that (immunological) system
And vice-versa
2.The rate of highness of percentage* of dominant genes in any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of efficiency of the immunological system of the same (protoplasms of ens)
And vice-versa
*For we term that there be a dominant: recessive percentage in every protoplasms of ens (cf. the mass:energy percentage).
And this dominant: recessive percentage must operate like unto the mass:energy percentage - and there must be a Principle of Dominant: Recessive Percentage which must operate like unto the Principle of the Mass: Energy Percentage -
3.And:
As by syllogistic reasoning:
The rate at which the dominant genes constitute the immunological system of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of highness of percentage of dominant genes in the same (protoplasms of ens)
And vice-versa
4.The rate of resistance to genes in any protoplasms of ens to bombarding variation: receptions
will be as directly proportional to the rate of dominant percentage at the site in those genes
And vice-versa
For its is the dominant genes that resist most the onslaught, say, of invading bacteria; the recessive genes fall first.
5.Further:
The rate of change (once having occurred) in any dominant gene by invading: bombarding variation: reception(s) will be as directly proportional to the rate of variation: mutation in the relative site
And vice-versa
Now I think that we must dwell a little on this Principle which is of revolutionary import and is indeed at the basis of progression of all evolution.
Now once that there is any bombardment: invasion of variation: reception(s) at any site in any protoplasms of ens it is the dominant genes that resist most (and this in as direct proportion as per the above-mentioned Principle of Resistance q.v.)
Any recessive gene at the bombarded: invaded site will succumb almost immediately - but then the gene (recessive gene) as altered will not constitute a very high variation: mutation.
But in the eventual alteration of dominant genes the picture and the situation is different.
For once that any dominant gene is altered then the alteration once lodged “in the body” of the relative protoplasms of ens will be increased in efficiency in as direct proportion.
As exprest in this Principle:
The rate of resistance of any gene to alteration by any variation: reception will be as directly proportional to the rate of mutation: variation operating in the relative gene once that, and if, it be altered
And vice-versa
I shall term this as at the basis of all evolutionary progression and as the font of engineering ways and means at the same time.
For once that we as by engineering means alter or mutate a dominant gene in any protoplasms of ens then we will reach an efficiency of engineering in as direct proportion to the rate of dominance of the gene altered
This itself is a Principle (q.v.).
Thus the maximum efficiency of engineering into protoplasms of ens is attained if a dominant gene rather than a recessive gene is altered; and further, amongst dominant genes themselves, if a more dominant gene rather than a less dominant gene be altered.
And all this must occur in as direct proportion to the rate of dominance (and in as inverse proportion to the rate of recession) of the (relative) genes.
25.8.1996
8.00 A M