This Paper investigates New Principles of Genetics as : (1) The rate of relative equality of the uniting genes in any genetic union will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution: differentiation of their product: offspring. And vice-versa; (2) The rate of (increase of) efficiency of uniting (in/by genetic experiment) of genes into new protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) uniting genes of relatively equal differentiation: evolution. And vice-versa. (3) The rate of relative equality of differentiation: evolution of genes in union will be as directly proportional to the rate of relative equality of dominant and recessive genes in the relative protoplasms of ens. And vice-versa. (4) The rate of (increase of) relative evolution: differentiation in protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate (increase of) vicinity to (relative) equality of percentage(s) of dominant and recessive genes in the same (protoplasms of ens). And vice-versa (5) Further: The rate of evolution: differentiation of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of progression of the same to s/c Immortality of Ens (q.v.) And vice-versa (6) The rate of progression to equality of dominant and recessive genes in any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of progression of the same to s/c Immortality of Ens. And vice-versa. (7) Hence the engineering Principle : Increase to equality of dominant and recessive genes in protoplasms of ens to be more and more near to s/c Immortality of Ens (q.v.).(And vice-versa) – as is manifested in the example of Bacterium where dominant and recessive genes are equal. And Basicity is directly proportional to Immortality.
1.Suppose that by means of genetic experiment we unite different genes of different species of protoplasms of ens by sexual reproduction.
2.Suppose that in so doing we look to the rate of differentiation of each of the respective sides to the equation of union between genes in the genetic: embryological process.
3.Suppose that an extremely differentiated* set of genes is united to a much less differentiated: evolved set of genes (Case A).
Then suppose that an extremely differentiated set of genes is united to an extremely differentiated: evolved set of genes (Case B).
Finally suppose that a very poorly differentiated: evolved set of genes is united to another very poorly differentiated: evolved set of genes (Case C).
*this is relative; for differentiation: evolution is in continual change, generally ever-increasing (though notionally - id est in the Ideal State - it could be reversed: decreased, as well see).
4. In Case A the product of the union will be a very poorly evolved protoplasms of ens; yet the
evolution: differentiation of the same though less than that of Case B will be higher than that of Case C.
In Case B the product of the union will be an extremely differentiated: evolved protoplasms of ens; the evolution: differentiation of which is higher than in both case A and case C.
In Case C the product of the union will be a very poorly differentiated: evolved protoplasms of ens; the evolution: differentiation of which is lower than in both case A and Case B.
Now in Case B and in Case C there will be a relative equality of differentiation: evolution in the union (genetic union) as per above experiment; in Case A there will be a relative inequality of evolution.
Therefore we speak of a rate of equality (relative equality) of evolution: differentiation; and a rate of inequality (relative inequality) of evolution: differentiation
5.What occurs in all the case - as in all phenomena that occur in the mass universe - occurs in proportion (by Law Rule or Principle) -
6.Therefore we shall seek out this proportion.
7.Thus we enunciate:
The following Principle:
The rate of relative equality of the uniting genes in any genetic union will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution: differentiation of their product: offspring
And vice-versa.
Note the extreme import of the Vice-versa here:
For whilst onward march or increase of evolution: differentiation will signify the progression of evolution (to Immortality of Ens - q.v. our previous works -) - the Vice-versa of the same will signify the Relative Reversal of Evolution (q.v.).
[Hence also a Principle of Relative Reversal of Evolution q.v.]
8.But there is also a very important engineering Principle to be derived from the Principle at (7):
namely:
The rate of (increase of) efficiency of uniting (in/by genetic experiment) of genes into new protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) uniting genes of relatively equal differentiation: evolution
And vice-versa.
9.Now in all protoplasms of ens there will be a number of genes that are dominant and a number of genes that are recessive.
The proportion or number of these in any protoplasms of ens need not necessarily be equal; rather I expect inequality of proportion.
But even here we shall meet with another Principle:
namely:
The rate of union of genes to new offspring: products multiplied by the rate of relative inequality of the same (genes in union) will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) inequality between dominant and recessive genes in the relative offspring: product protoplasms of ens
And vice-versa
Note the import of the vice-versa here.
And we shall see why further.
10.As in to-day’s works, the rate of relative equality of differentiation: evolution of genes in union will be as directly proportional to the rate of relative equality of dominant and recessive genes in the relative protoplasms of ens
And vice-versa.
This is syllogistic reasoning; but how important!
11.Further:
The rate of (increase of) relative evolution: differentiation in protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate (increase of) vicinity to (relative) equality of percentage(s) of dominant and recessive genes in the same (protoplasms of ens)
And vice-versa
12.Further:
The rate of evolution: differentiation of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of progression of the same to s/c Immortality of Ens (q.v.)
And vice-versa
13.And further:
By syllogistic reasoning:
The rate of progression to equality of dominant and recessive genes in any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of progression of the same to s/c Immortality of Ens
And vice-versa.
14.Hence the engineering Principle :
Increase to equality of dominant and recessive genes in protoplasms of ens to be more and more near to s/c Immortality of Ens (q.v.).
(And vice-versa).
15.The revolutionary import is very obvious.
See the example in Bacterium.
Here there is the nearest equality (for this is relative), the nearest position to equality of dominant and recessive genes.
And we are - in as direct proportion - in the nearest vicinity of protoplasms of ens to Immortality of Ens (q.v)
16.Further the rate of basicity of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to its rate of vicinity to Immortality of Ens
And vice-versa
(Vedi again : Bacterium).
17.Further:
As by syllogistic reasoning:
The rate of basicity of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of equality of percentage of dominant and recessive genes in the same
And vice-versa
St Mary’s Feast Day
15/8/1996
8.31 A M
1.Suppose that by means of genetic experiment we unite different genes of different species of protoplasms of ens by sexual reproduction.
2.Suppose that in so doing we look to the rate of differentiation of each of the respective sides to the equation of union between genes in the genetic: embryological process.
3.Suppose that an extremely differentiated* set of genes is united to a much less differentiated: evolved set of genes (Case A).
Then suppose that an extremely differentiated set of genes is united to an extremely differentiated: evolved set of genes (Case B).
Finally suppose that a very poorly differentiated: evolved set of genes is united to another very poorly differentiated: evolved set of genes (Case C).
*this is relative; for differentiation: evolution is in continual change, generally ever-increasing (though notionally - id est in the Ideal State - it could be reversed: decreased, as well see).
4. In Case A the product of the union will be a very poorly evolved protoplasms of ens; yet the
evolution: differentiation of the same though less than that of Case B will be higher than that of Case C.
In Case B the product of the union will be an extremely differentiated: evolved protoplasms of ens; the evolution: differentiation of which is higher than in both case A and case C.
In Case C the product of the union will be a very poorly differentiated: evolved protoplasms of ens; the evolution: differentiation of which is lower than in both case A and Case B.
Now in Case B and in Case C there will be a relative equality of differentiation: evolution in the union (genetic union) as per above experiment; in Case A there will be a relative inequality of evolution.
Therefore we speak of a rate of equality (relative equality) of evolution: differentiation; and a rate of inequality (relative inequality) of evolution: differentiation
5.What occurs in all the case - as in all phenomena that occur in the mass universe - occurs in proportion (by Law Rule or Principle) -
6.Therefore we shall seek out this proportion.
7.Thus we enunciate:
The following Principle:
The rate of relative equality of the uniting genes in any genetic union will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) evolution: differentiation of their product: offspring
And vice-versa.
Note the extreme import of the Vice-versa here:
For whilst onward march or increase of evolution: differentiation will signify the progression of evolution (to Immortality of Ens - q.v. our previous works -) - the Vice-versa of the same will signify the Relative Reversal of Evolution (q.v.).
[Hence also a Principle of Relative Reversal of Evolution q.v.]
8.But there is also a very important engineering Principle to be derived from the Principle at (7):
namely:
The rate of (increase of) efficiency of uniting (in/by genetic experiment) of genes into new protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) uniting genes of relatively equal differentiation: evolution
And vice-versa.
9.Now in all protoplasms of ens there will be a number of genes that are dominant and a number of genes that are recessive.
The proportion or number of these in any protoplasms of ens need not necessarily be equal; rather I expect inequality of proportion.
But even here we shall meet with another Principle:
namely:
The rate of union of genes to new offspring: products multiplied by the rate of relative inequality of the same (genes in union) will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) inequality between dominant and recessive genes in the relative offspring: product protoplasms of ens
And vice-versa
Note the import of the vice-versa here.
And we shall see why further.
10.As in to-day’s works, the rate of relative equality of differentiation: evolution of genes in union will be as directly proportional to the rate of relative equality of dominant and recessive genes in the relative protoplasms of ens
And vice-versa.
This is syllogistic reasoning; but how important!
11.Further:
The rate of (increase of) relative evolution: differentiation in protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate (increase of) vicinity to (relative) equality of percentage(s) of dominant and recessive genes in the same (protoplasms of ens)
And vice-versa
12.Further:
The rate of evolution: differentiation of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of progression of the same to s/c Immortality of Ens (q.v.)
And vice-versa
13.And further:
By syllogistic reasoning:
The rate of progression to equality of dominant and recessive genes in any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of progression of the same to s/c Immortality of Ens
And vice-versa.
14.Hence the engineering Principle :
Increase to equality of dominant and recessive genes in protoplasms of ens to be more and more near to s/c Immortality of Ens (q.v.).
(And vice-versa).
15.The revolutionary import is very obvious.
See the example in Bacterium.
Here there is the nearest equality (for this is relative), the nearest position to equality of dominant and recessive genes.
And we are - in as direct proportion - in the nearest vicinity of protoplasms of ens to Immortality of Ens (q.v)
16.Further the rate of basicity of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to its rate of vicinity to Immortality of Ens
And vice-versa
(Vedi again : Bacterium).
17.Further:
As by syllogistic reasoning:
The rate of basicity of any protoplasms of ens will be as directly proportional to the rate of equality of percentage of dominant and recessive genes in the same
And vice-versa
St Mary’s Feast Day
15/8/1996
8.31 A M