**PRINCIPLES OF THE MASS UNIVERSE AS RELATED TO DESIGN AND PHENOMENA**

*This Paper investigates the Principle of the mass universe as related to Design and Phenomena*

1.In the mass universe there occurs the following Principle: Equation namely:

That:

The rate of (increase of) Principles et in the mass universe (P) = rate of (increase of) Design (D) divided by the rate of (increase of) Phenomena (p)

Thus:

P = D x p

By algebraic transformation:

D = P divided by p

and

p = D divided by P

Note the import of the simple - yet revolutionary - algebraic transformations.

Therefore, too, if the number of Phenomena be low, the rate of Design in the mass universe will be high even if the number of Principles be = 1 or ---> 1 (a)

But if the number of Principles be high, the rate of Design in the mass universe will be high even if the number of Phenomena be very high as well. (b)

But if the number of Principles be low, the rate of Design in the mass universe will be low, if the number of Phenomena be high ©

{The terms “high” and “low” must obviously be taken in a relative sense; not absolute}

*2.But in the mass universe - and as we perceive empirically - the number of (increase of) Phenomena from the Rim onwards occurs in as direct proportion to the rate of (increase of) Principles et*

*And vice-versa*

Thus the difficulties at (a) (b) and (c) supra are bypassed.

3.Therefore - apart from the manifestations that are the Ten Principles that we enunciated on a Saint George’s Day of several years ago - the above-mentioned Principles together manifest that our universe is neither a freak universe nor a “God-determined one” as Russell Stannard, professor of physics at Open University in

*Science and Wonders*as presented on air (in the BBC) would have.

Professor Stannard (as reported in Forum at p.46 of the

*New Scientist*of 10th August 1996) is not correct to assume two alternatives of either a freak universe or a “God-determined one”. Neither alternative; but what is manifested by these presents.

Professor Stannard incorrectly mentions “coincidences” : he upholds that if the gravitational constant we different, we would not be here. If the neutrinos were a bit more slippery we would not be here. That the gravitational constant is at is no freak but as determined, and determined by the global workings of the Ten Principles and of the present Principles in the mass:universe. The same for the neutrinos. And for the rest.

Independence Day

21/9/1996

8.00 A M