OF RELATIVITY IN THE MASS UNIVERSE
This Paper investigates the methodology and occurrence of Relativity in the mass universe
1.In the mass universe there is no right or wrong - and further - and this is most important - no absolute right or absolute wrong - but relative vicinity (and not right) and relative distance (and not wrong).
2.As just mentioned we are expressing in terms of rate of motion in using the terms distance and vicinity instead of wrong and right respectively.
And distance and vicinity in themselves carry the relativity that they are (meant to) imply.
The relativity of quantum and/or rate of motion from a common point of departure that is the point of common ancestor (principle(s)).
3.For the measurement of our s/c “right” and s/c “wrong” (or s/c “correct” and s/c “incorrect”) of Principles theories hypotheses and so on lies in the rate of distance - very relative at that - from the common ancestor principle(s)
4.Thus the Principle:
The rate of (increase of) distance from a common ancestor Principle(s) point will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) distance:wrong:incorrect from the same and as inversely proportional to the rate of (increase of) vicinity:right:correct from the same
And vice-versa
5.The rate of (increase of) differentiation of any matter:energy in the mass:universe will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) distance from the common ancestor (Principle(s))
And vice-versa
6.Therefore in increase of differentiation there will be a greater propensity to (increase of) distance:wrong:incorrect than in the case of > rate of differentiation and that this occurs in as direct proportion.
Hence the Principle that:
The rate in increase of differentiation will be as directly proportional to the rate of increase of propensity of distance:wrong:incorrect and as inversely proportional to the rate of propensity to/of vicinity:right:correct
And vice-versa
7.Therefore the rate of increase of differentiation can be depicted as a flight of successive steps (the number of which is finite - but ever-increasing - this is evolution) the first step lying and being at the point of common ancestor Principle(s)
As we go higher up the flight of stairs the rate of widespreadness of the relative differentiation will diminish and decrease - and this in as direct proportion.
Therefore we enunciate the Principle:
That:
The rate of increase of differentiation in the mass:universe will be as directly proportional to the rate of decrease of widespreadness of the same (specific differentiation)
And vice-versa
8.And the rate of widespreadness is as directly proportional to the rate of basicity; as was manifested earlier on in our works.
Therefore - and as by syllogistic reasoning - the rate of increase of differentiation in the mass:universe will be as directly proportional to the rate of decrease of basicity of the same (specific differentiation) and as inversely proportional to the rate of increase of basicity of the same (specific differentiation)
And vice-versa
9.In protoplasms of ens reduction occurs only in males; and it occurs only when the level or threshold of variation: reception is exceeded.
10.At this juncture we consider the following:
a. between one cell and another (in any multicellullar protoplasms of ens) there is communication or passage of energy: motion
b.between one part and another of any one same cell the same as in a. occurs
c.the passage of matter:energy occurs rather in the form of a current or currents than in the form of mass: particles.
d.the motion of matter:energy which is sub-divided to infinitely small particles must be considered more as a current: wave of energy: motion rather than as a chemical:combination:particle of mass: motion
e.the rate at which the motion of matter:energy moves as a current: wave - and the vice-versa of this - is relative not absolute (id est -- 0% or --- 100% but never = 0% or = 100%)
f.the rate at which the motion of matter:energy moves as current waves will be as directly proportional to the rate of size of the relative particle whence it proceeds and is “shot”
And vice-versa
Therefore since that in cells the sizes of particles whence matter:energy is transmitted (to other cells) is extremely tiny (though never = O - Vedi the Principle of Mass: Energy Percentage) - therefore and in as direct proportion it moves forth as wave(s):current(s)
and from this we proceed to a “refinement” of the Principle at (f) namely:
g.the rate at which motion of matter:energy moves as current waves (m) multiplied by the rate of actual distance (d) traveled by the same multiplied by the rate of speed (v) of the same will be as directly proportional to the rate of motion of the same (matter:energy) as (a) Current(s):wave(s)
And vice-versa
Now both f and g are of immense and revolutionary import; but g more so.
And the working of g is best seen between one cell and another of the brain organ or equivalent; and between one cell of the soma of protoplasms of ens and a cell in the brain organ or equivalent of that soma of protoplasms of ens
h.and further:
the working of the Principle at g is further seen in the occurrence of reduction in protoplasms of ens - males of protoplasms of ens - in which variations: receptions are transmitted to the DNA ready for the next generation(s).
There is thus a Cycle:
i.the reception of variation:reception in cells up to a definite specific threshold level:
followed by:
ii.the motion of the variation:reception matter:energy to the brain organ or equivalent:
followed by:
iii.the motion of the matter:energy in the brain organ or equivalent in the chemical combination of the matter of variation:reception with specific matter in the brain organ or equivalent (formation of say testosterone) (I term this the testosterone formation stage)
followed by:
iv.the transmission of the testosterone to the gonads
followed by:
v.the (bio)chemical combination of the testosterone (and of the variation: receptions with it carried) - with matter:energy particles in the gonad:
followed by:
vi.the reduction of the matter:energy thus combined (as in (v)) in the physical confines of the gonad;
followed by:
vii.the particles resulting from the reduction as in vi. clustering into seed: sperms.
Thus in these Seven Steps (Stages) Reduction: Reproduction Incorporating Variation: Reception occurs.
And having come full circle; the Cycle re-starts.
I. when the threshold: level of variation:reception is reached there are these outlets:
A. the transformation into the Seven Steps (Stages) Cycle just: mentioned or
B.the retention of the same in the cell - this is the case of s/c cancer(ous) growth(s) or
C.the transmission of the emanating current: waves not to the brain organ or equivalent but to the nearest and most contiguous cells : in these cases there occur the following parallel motions namely:
the destruction of the invaded cells (x) :
the growth - and division - of the current: wave transmitting cells (y) :
the replacement in situ of the destroyed invaded cells (x) by the dividing cells as in (y) - (z).
The parallel motions occur in simultaneity.
The rate of parallel ness of motion is as directly proportional to its rate of simultaneity of occurrence
And vice-versa
11.All that is asserted is never right:correct or wrong:incorrect but distant or near to the common:ancestor point(s).
Therefore assert without fear.
And assert continously.
15/9/1996
8.31 A M
Referring to today’s works in their globality:
Have we not established and manifested a mechanics of the positions of molecules, atoms et in say protoplasms of ens in s/c Ageing, s/c Percentage Error and s/c Death?
Have we not manifested the path of an engineering of s/c Percentage Error, s/c Ageing and s/c Death as to eliminate, forestall, or eradicate them through the proper, dexterous and efficient engineering use of position?
Have we not laid down the foundations of how the moment of collapse occurs when the decrease in the number of dominant positions multiplied by the rate of contiguous adjacency of the same is > than the remaining number (from the original number) of dominant positions multiplied by the rate of contiguous adjacency of the same?
8/9/1996
Victory Day
4.31 P M
This Paper investigates the methodology and occurrence of Relativity in the mass universe
1.In the mass universe there is no right or wrong - and further - and this is most important - no absolute right or absolute wrong - but relative vicinity (and not right) and relative distance (and not wrong).
2.As just mentioned we are expressing in terms of rate of motion in using the terms distance and vicinity instead of wrong and right respectively.
And distance and vicinity in themselves carry the relativity that they are (meant to) imply.
The relativity of quantum and/or rate of motion from a common point of departure that is the point of common ancestor (principle(s)).
3.For the measurement of our s/c “right” and s/c “wrong” (or s/c “correct” and s/c “incorrect”) of Principles theories hypotheses and so on lies in the rate of distance - very relative at that - from the common ancestor principle(s)
4.Thus the Principle:
The rate of (increase of) distance from a common ancestor Principle(s) point will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) distance:wrong:incorrect from the same and as inversely proportional to the rate of (increase of) vicinity:right:correct from the same
And vice-versa
5.The rate of (increase of) differentiation of any matter:energy in the mass:universe will be as directly proportional to the rate of (increase of) distance from the common ancestor (Principle(s))
And vice-versa
6.Therefore in increase of differentiation there will be a greater propensity to (increase of) distance:wrong:incorrect than in the case of > rate of differentiation and that this occurs in as direct proportion.
Hence the Principle that:
The rate in increase of differentiation will be as directly proportional to the rate of increase of propensity of distance:wrong:incorrect and as inversely proportional to the rate of propensity to/of vicinity:right:correct
And vice-versa
7.Therefore the rate of increase of differentiation can be depicted as a flight of successive steps (the number of which is finite - but ever-increasing - this is evolution) the first step lying and being at the point of common ancestor Principle(s)
As we go higher up the flight of stairs the rate of widespreadness of the relative differentiation will diminish and decrease - and this in as direct proportion.
Therefore we enunciate the Principle:
That:
The rate of increase of differentiation in the mass:universe will be as directly proportional to the rate of decrease of widespreadness of the same (specific differentiation)
And vice-versa
8.And the rate of widespreadness is as directly proportional to the rate of basicity; as was manifested earlier on in our works.
Therefore - and as by syllogistic reasoning - the rate of increase of differentiation in the mass:universe will be as directly proportional to the rate of decrease of basicity of the same (specific differentiation) and as inversely proportional to the rate of increase of basicity of the same (specific differentiation)
And vice-versa
9.In protoplasms of ens reduction occurs only in males; and it occurs only when the level or threshold of variation: reception is exceeded.
10.At this juncture we consider the following:
a. between one cell and another (in any multicellullar protoplasms of ens) there is communication or passage of energy: motion
b.between one part and another of any one same cell the same as in a. occurs
c.the passage of matter:energy occurs rather in the form of a current or currents than in the form of mass: particles.
d.the motion of matter:energy which is sub-divided to infinitely small particles must be considered more as a current: wave of energy: motion rather than as a chemical:combination:particle of mass: motion
e.the rate at which the motion of matter:energy moves as a current: wave - and the vice-versa of this - is relative not absolute (id est -- 0% or --- 100% but never = 0% or = 100%)
f.the rate at which the motion of matter:energy moves as current waves will be as directly proportional to the rate of size of the relative particle whence it proceeds and is “shot”
And vice-versa
Therefore since that in cells the sizes of particles whence matter:energy is transmitted (to other cells) is extremely tiny (though never = O - Vedi the Principle of Mass: Energy Percentage) - therefore and in as direct proportion it moves forth as wave(s):current(s)
and from this we proceed to a “refinement” of the Principle at (f) namely:
g.the rate at which motion of matter:energy moves as current waves (m) multiplied by the rate of actual distance (d) traveled by the same multiplied by the rate of speed (v) of the same will be as directly proportional to the rate of motion of the same (matter:energy) as (a) Current(s):wave(s)
And vice-versa
Now both f and g are of immense and revolutionary import; but g more so.
And the working of g is best seen between one cell and another of the brain organ or equivalent; and between one cell of the soma of protoplasms of ens and a cell in the brain organ or equivalent of that soma of protoplasms of ens
h.and further:
the working of the Principle at g is further seen in the occurrence of reduction in protoplasms of ens - males of protoplasms of ens - in which variations: receptions are transmitted to the DNA ready for the next generation(s).
There is thus a Cycle:
i.the reception of variation:reception in cells up to a definite specific threshold level:
followed by:
ii.the motion of the variation:reception matter:energy to the brain organ or equivalent:
followed by:
iii.the motion of the matter:energy in the brain organ or equivalent in the chemical combination of the matter of variation:reception with specific matter in the brain organ or equivalent (formation of say testosterone) (I term this the testosterone formation stage)
followed by:
iv.the transmission of the testosterone to the gonads
followed by:
v.the (bio)chemical combination of the testosterone (and of the variation: receptions with it carried) - with matter:energy particles in the gonad:
followed by:
vi.the reduction of the matter:energy thus combined (as in (v)) in the physical confines of the gonad;
followed by:
vii.the particles resulting from the reduction as in vi. clustering into seed: sperms.
Thus in these Seven Steps (Stages) Reduction: Reproduction Incorporating Variation: Reception occurs.
And having come full circle; the Cycle re-starts.
I. when the threshold: level of variation:reception is reached there are these outlets:
A. the transformation into the Seven Steps (Stages) Cycle just: mentioned or
B.the retention of the same in the cell - this is the case of s/c cancer(ous) growth(s) or
C.the transmission of the emanating current: waves not to the brain organ or equivalent but to the nearest and most contiguous cells : in these cases there occur the following parallel motions namely:
the destruction of the invaded cells (x) :
the growth - and division - of the current: wave transmitting cells (y) :
the replacement in situ of the destroyed invaded cells (x) by the dividing cells as in (y) - (z).
The parallel motions occur in simultaneity.
The rate of parallel ness of motion is as directly proportional to its rate of simultaneity of occurrence
And vice-versa
11.All that is asserted is never right:correct or wrong:incorrect but distant or near to the common:ancestor point(s).
Therefore assert without fear.
And assert continously.
15/9/1996
8.31 A M
Referring to today’s works in their globality:
Have we not established and manifested a mechanics of the positions of molecules, atoms et in say protoplasms of ens in s/c Ageing, s/c Percentage Error and s/c Death?
Have we not manifested the path of an engineering of s/c Percentage Error, s/c Ageing and s/c Death as to eliminate, forestall, or eradicate them through the proper, dexterous and efficient engineering use of position?
Have we not laid down the foundations of how the moment of collapse occurs when the decrease in the number of dominant positions multiplied by the rate of contiguous adjacency of the same is > than the remaining number (from the original number) of dominant positions multiplied by the rate of contiguous adjacency of the same?
8/9/1996
Victory Day
4.31 P M