*This Paper investigates the relation between Perception and Extension and therefore between Perception and the Life Processes themselves*

*In the mass universe perception (P) of matter: energy (by itself and of itself) is the multiplicand of the rate of extension (E) of the same by its rate of division (D)*

*Put in equation form:*

*(P) = (E) X (D)*

*By algebraic transformation:*

*(E) = (P) divided by (D)*

*and:*

*(D) = (P) divided by (E)*

In cell division of protoplasms of ens division of cells occurs accordant to the above-mentioned formula (P) = (E) X (D)

That division of cells perception and extension are co-terminous in time: space is manifest from the Principle of Basicity.

The basicity of perception, of extension and of cell division is equivalent:identical : the rate of widespreadness being also equivalent:identical.

**Now all this is equivalent:identical is proportional (direct proportion).**

**Therefore perception, extension and cell division (as well as widespreadness) are all proportional to each other.**

**Thus the rate of suspension of one**will be as directly proportional to the rate of suspension of the others

And vice-versa

And the rate of termination of one will be as directly proportional to the rate of termination of the others

And vice-versa

And the rate of occurrence of one will be as directly proportional to the rate of occurrence of the others

And vice-versa

*Now I think that this is all very revolutionary.*

*For first, we have a clearer notion of what perception is - through the Formula:Equation:Principle above-mentioned.*

*Hume had in his works hinted at existence as a “bundle of perceptions”*

*And I add:*

*Perceptions are bundles of shocks*

*Now a shock is pluri-dimensional accordant to its physical direction.*

*In one dimension it hits the perception of the fact-in-being which it physically hits; in one dimension it hits physically the fact-in-being in question.*

*In the first case perception is perceived - in terms of sound et - by the fact-in-being in feeling: emotion; in the second case it is perceived by third party or by itself facts-in-being - through eyes - in terms of light*

*The plurality of the dimensions of perception is thus very manifest:*

*It is perceived in terms of sound et (except light) - this is perception in common jargon - and this perception in common jargon is perceived by the “perceiving subject” and as perceived by the “perceiving subject” only*

*And if it is perceived in terms of light it is sight : whether by third parties or by the ens itself.*

*Thus the same matter: energy is perceivable either in terms of sound et (Dimension A) or in terms of light (Dimension B).*

*We next turn to the wave: particle effect.*

Here the same ens is wave and particle at the same time:place.

The answer - if culled from the above - is simple :

*Dimension A of any matter:energy is wave; Dimension B is particle*

*Now apply the just-mentioned to cell division.*

*In Dimension A cell-division is a bundle of sounds et - what we termed “shocks”*

*In Dimension B cell-division is a bundle of contiguous adjacent particles from atoms to molecules to the cell.*

*This Paper is a continuation of the previous Paper 5 and the dimensions of cell division are dealt with in new Principles up to a methodology of the unwinding of the DNA*

*Now what is divided is divided in both Dimension A and Dimension B.*

*Thus in cell-division the cell is divided in both Dimensions.*

*When the cell divides therefore its bundle of shocks divides in two just as does its bundle of particles*

*That is:*

*The heat, sound et of the cell divides just as its light divides.*

*The occurrence of both Dimensions is equal, equivalent:identical and at the same and identical time:space units*Now any bundle of shocks that divides must do by Polarity (q.v.).

This was manifested quite years ago in our earliest works.

For shocks of different signs attract; those of the same sign repel.

Here is the rationale of shock division in cells :

*Shocks of the same sign repel.*

And therefore it comes that the strands of DNA repel each other, and in repelling unwind themselves in their characteristic pattern.

But there is no unwinding of DNA without repellence

Indeed the rate of unwinding of DNA will be as directly proportional to its rate of repellence

**And vice-versa**

Note the import of the Vice-versa here